User talk:Tycio

Talk Pages
Been going over edits. One thing I should be noted is that of talk pages, how you've inserted year level 2 headings (2012, 2013, etc.). As a general statement, I'll say, not to do this. That they've been redundant aside (as in, every talk page entry would need to be converted to a level 3 heading to come under them), talk pages are usually spread over such a long time that year designations aren't needed. If a talk page becomes too large it would generally be archived, but that's something the other admins will decide.

In other words, keep up the edits, but be wary of editing talk pages in this manner. It's generally regarded as iffy to revise them bar signing unsigned comments.--Hawki (talk) 22:19, April 6, 2014 (UTC)

I'm going to repeat what I said above, that talk pages don't need years. Also, they're meant to discuss the content of the article rather than theories. So wondering whether Leah would be a princess is something better reserved for a blog post or forum rather than a talk page.Hawki (talk) 06:54, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Level 1 headings shouldn't be used anywhere. The article titles are level 1 headings and adding more tells search engines that the article title isn't important. ◄► Tephra ◄► 07:12, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Re: Fandom Q
It's fine to move the stuff to your pages - haven't you already done so?

Concerning other stuff, TBH, I think a lot of it's also redundant. For instance, it isn't worth creating a page on The Arreat Summit IMO, because the site already exists. Certainly worth noting in trivia for the Arreat Summit article for instance, but not to the extent that it needs its own page.

That said, have limited time these days, so I won't be getting round to the issue for some time, if at all. So official sites can stay in the short term.Hawki (talk) 07:56, 10 February 2021 (UTC)