Template talk:R

Any ideas of how to improve the param ? It just works, but probably is not a best practice (that  has to be used; other values or just param name won't work). Ideally it should work as. Trang Oul (talk) 08:16, March 10, 2020 (UTC)


 * Yes, it can work like that as I have tested with R/2. However, why is there not also an option to show both the image and link? It could work like:


 * 1)  - Link only
 * 2)  - Image only
 * 3)  - Both link and image
 * Not sure what would be appropriate for "x" though.
 * Or, possibly it could be  causes both... ◄► Tephra ◄►  17:57, March 10, 2020 (UTC)


 * Why not image and link? Because I'm a beginner at template syntax. :)
 * What about  for both image and link?
 * is somehow counter-intuitive, as  is the default behavior, and wouldn't those parameters need to be in a particular order (i.e. , not  )?
 * In the beginning I was also thinking about a new, dedicated template, say,, but that'd result in a lot of duplication.
 * Trang Oul (talk) 07:44, March 11, 2020 (UTC)


 * Template:R/2 appears to be functional. I will move the code over to Template:R when I have time to run a bot to update all of the instances of the template to make use of the new system. ◄► Tephra ◄► 08:47, March 11, 2020 (UTC)