Talk:Buriza-Do Kyanon (Diablo II)

Yes, but it's just unnecessary. I don't think we need to reflect what the game says exactly. If the game is pleonastic, do we need to be too? Dan (talk) 08:05, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * What does pleonastic mean? :-P But if we're making a skill page. We type what the game says. Any additional comment is added in the bottom under the usage section. In this case the per character level was seen in the game. You could change the 2.5 per level thing. But not what is seen in-game. I suggest marking with an asterisk and commenting below the descrip. And have you player Myth II: Soulblighter? In the second scenario, a warrior runs up to you. His name is Tristram. Is it worth trivia? Can you add it? I'm in the middle of my lectures now. "OMG LOLZ LUK HOW PUWAFOOL DA WITCH DOCTA IZZ!!!" - Mobokill 08:21, 9 August 2008 (UTC)


 * "pleonastic" means redundant, from pleonasm. But anyway, this way it just seems more informative. more informative wiki= better wiki. Don't you think so? And what's myth II? Oh, just googled it. Looks a little like Warcraft and it's from bungie, and Halo's not that dissimilar to Starcraft. ;). Maybe they're fans of Blizzard.:)) Dan (talk) 09:02, 9 August 2008 (UTC)